Field & Particle Fundamentals
By Thomas Lee Abshier
Wednesday, May 13, 2009
Dipole Particles (DPs) populate space
Consider: that magnetic poles may only occupy definite angles of orientation, since
angular orientation must necessarily be defined with definite infinitesimal increments.
If this is the case, then photons and kinetic energy fields will necessarily be
limited in their options of magnetic orientation. The rules of energy require the
redistribution of the action (i.e. energetic action, the joule-sec of energy associated
with any energetic structure) of a photon, wave, mass, or other energy over the uncertainty
limits of the momentum-location or time-energy distribution.
∆x∙∆p ≤ ħ/2
∆t∙∆E ≤ ħ/2
The uncertainty reflects the summation of the waves that are necessary to produce
a given macro energetic structure. Thus, it is not the individual item that is maintained
in its coherence, but many underlying structures. The association between the various
pieces can be undone, overcome, destroyed by the introduction of a larger force,
which disentangles the packet association of waves constituting any given particulate
identity.
The principle of entanglement produces a set of particles (FPs) that are associated
with each other out to infinity. At every moment, the action on another DP is based
upon how many FPs strike it.
The units of Planck’s constant, the Joule-sec = kg-m²/sec, are chosen only for convenience
to match the commonly used increments of distance and energy or energy and time.
Planck’s constant would be normalized under the following conditions:
Planck Mass = the mass-energy corresponding to the DPs enrolled by the movement of
a single DP between two gridpoints in one moment, and the associated electric and
magnetic fields created by that DP movement.
Planck Time = the moment, the smallest unit of time
Planck Distance = the distance between two gridpoints
Using these units, Planck’s constant would be unity.
For purposes of visualization of unit correspondence consider the following qualitative
unit equivalence:
Units of ħ = Joule-sec = kg-m²/sec = DPmass x (gridpoint-distance)²/moment
If the creation can only act in increments of action that correspond to multiples
of Planck’s constant, then we can model every movement of mass and waves around this
limit.
Note that the uncertainty principle can be interpreted so that every particle of
mass can be modeled as a set of waves of various wavelength, which places the location
of the particle in a very tight position but many possible energies, and very loosely
located if its velocity is well known. Such an explanation is mathematically satisfying
but intuitively unsatisfying because we do not have a model of reality that allows
us to visualize the processes which confine the particle to a volume of space, but
have an indistinct location. Examples of the reality of this phenomenon can be seen
in the electron orbital, dual slit electron interference.
The position of the electron is accepted as not being under the rules of chaos, which
is a Newtonian concept. Rather, the quantum mechanical behavior of the electron
is considered to be the result of an inherent distribution of probabilities. But,
I wish to dispute this assertion, and note that chaotic progresses and evolution
can give the appearance of the system we see in the quantum mechanical scale.
In particular, the entangled mass can only occupy a certain multiple of Planck’s
constant of action. Thus, the electron’s next position is predicted by the conditions
of the current system, and variability is introduced into the position of the electron
because of limitations in where the energy can fit in the atomic orbital. Thus,
the previous position, the state of the current system, and the limitations of the
positions the electron may take because of occupied energies and states work together
to dictate where the electron may move on its next moment.
