Subatomic Particle Structure
By: Thomas Lee Abshier, ND
- The positron and electron masses are both are both assembled from coalesced particles
of Positive DPs or Negative DPs.
o Likewise, all the particles in the Subatomic Zoo are also assemblies of Negative
DPs and Positive DPs.
o The Standard Model posits the Quark as the subunit of assembly of many particles
in the Subatomic Zoo.
o But, for the purposes of easily visualizing the structure and family relationships
between the various particles of the Subatomic zoo, we shall consider the basic building
block of all the particles as being combinations of Electron and Positron masses.
The electrons and positrons internal to the subatomic particles will have some kind
of energetic storage associated with their relationship, and as a result, when the
particles decay into particle fragments, they, will release that extra energy as
a neutrino or photon.
- In this system, where the subatomic particles are constructed with electron and positron
masses as their constituent units, the following assemblies would correspond to the
various masses.
o The Proton is a combination of approximately 1800 electrons and positrons, with
a net positron excess of 1+.
o The neutron is a collection of approximately 1800 electrons and positrons, with
an equal number of each.
- Justification for this “electron and positron as fundamental-subunit” hypothesis
is as follows:
o A proton converts into a neutron when it captures a high-energy electron.
o Likewise, when a neutron decays it loses an electron and a neutrino.
§ The hypothesis that the neutron and proton are composed of 1800 electrons and protons
comes from the observation that the relative mass of the neutron is 1800 times the
mass of the electron and positron.
o When the neutron decays, and releases an electron and neutrino, the amount of kinetic
energy lost is constant, but the amount of energy carried by the electron and neutrino
are variable.
§ Thus, the total energy lost by the neutron when it decays is shared between the
neutron and electron.
§ Thus, the increment of energy carried by the neutrino may be small or large.
o The question then becomes “What is a neutrino? Is it a particle or is it a wave?”
§ The neutrino appears to travel at the speed of light, or very close to it.
§ The spin of the neutrino is ½, which is the same as particles of mass. This is
unusual since no other photon/wave type disturbance has this spin, all others have
integer spins.
§ The neutrino may be a photon, a wave disturbance, a electromagnetic correlation
of DPs. But, its slightly subliminal velocity, its change in newly hypothesized
change in configuration mid-flight, and ½ spin argue against this position.
§ It may be a particle, an actual bonded group of DPs that travel through space.
Its extremely high speed, (very near lightspeed regardless of the amount of energy
it possesses), indicates that it is extremely light – possibly comprised of only
a few DPs bonded together. Thus, even a very small energy could accelerate it to
extremely high speeds.
§ Regardless of the neutrino’s actual configuration (particle or wave), we know that
the neutrino is the medium of choice used by many subatomic decay processes to carry
away the remnant of excess energy no longer held within its bonds.
§ If the neutrino is a wave, it opens up the possibility that space can hold a wave-like
quantum of energy with ½ spin. But, if this is the case, then probably this phenomenon
only occurs in processes with a size distribution on the order of the subatomic particle.
- In this theory, where subatomic particles are assemblies of electrons and positrons,
each subatomic particle is composed of its own unique number and configuration of
electrons and positrons in relationship to each other.
o It is easy to see how mass phenomena could arise from mass structured in this manner.
The kinetic energy of motion, KE = ½ mv2, can store in the B field generated by
moving charges.
o The electron and positron could be the elements of structure that layer together
from the more elemental DPs, to the complexity of subatomic particles, atoms, molecules,
compounds, organic molecules, cells, tissues, organs, systems and life.
o But, we are not wedded to the electron and positron being these fundamental units.
We are merely generating a scenario where their candidacy is plausible.
- Restated: the electron and positron could be one of the near-ground level building
blocks in creating the extreme complexity we view in life.
o For example: electrons and positrons create protons and neutrons.
o Neutrons, protons and electrons create atoms.
o Atoms of various types bond chemically to create the infinite variety of molecules.
o The molecules are the building blocks which create composites for the formation
of the entire spectrum of inorganic non-living matter, and organic living matter.
o Thus, the DPs and the electron and positron masses, serve as the elemental substrates
that compose the animate and inanimate world.
- But, the only place where this examination has significant relevance is on the level
of the subatomic zoo.
o The current theory has dictated that the elemental units that form subatomic particles
are quarks.
o Thus we shall examine the Standard Model, and see if we can use our DP Sea and
Gridpoint model to manifest all the properties of kinetic energy, mass, and inertia.
These mass-energy phenomena were well explained by using the electron and positrons
as the building blocks of the more complex particles (neutrons, protons, mesons,
neutrinos, and leptons).
